Since the beginning of the war in Syria in 2011, the European Union and its member states have given €10 billion worth of aid to Syrians inside and outside the country, says Le Monde.
The EU, the largest provider of humanitarian aid to Syria, organised a conference this April in support of peace process pursued by the United Nations.
In order to ‘create conditions for a return to normal life,’ the EU is also looking for ways to help on the ground, assisting – for example – with the management of the four ‘de-escalation zones’ along the country’s western border.
If a ceasefire eventually comes out of the agenda both sides agreed upon during the Geneva peace talks, ‘the cost of rebuilding Syria will be beyond what anyone can imagine.’
‘No one, not the Russians, nor the Gulf countries, nor the Americans, will have the means to cover the costs alone.’
‘The EU won’t either,’ says Le Monde, ‘but it could play a key role.’
Though we shouldn’t get carried away, this is going to be a very long process.
It would be ‘unrealistic’ to think that after seven years of civil war, war against ISIS, and several hundreds of thousands of deaths, ‘Syrians will be able to pick up from where they left off, as if nothing had happened.’
When – and how – the peace process concludes will be up to the Syrians themselves, not the UN or the EU.
After all, as the UN Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura said himself, the country has a “sophisticated” political culture that mustn’t be underestimated.
Besides Russia and the US, ‘other regional actors must become more involved,’ said Le Monde.
What the EU can do is to continue to support the peace process and ‘help the Syrians who wish for peace and democracy for their country.’
After the devastating terrorist attacks in Paris and Brussels in 2016, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was quick to point fingers: “despite our warnings that this person was a foreign terrorist fighter, Belgium could not establish any links with terrorism.”
Indeed, previous warnings regarding the identities of those involved in the Paris and Brussels attacks had been ignored, and local and regional police networks failed to prevent the catastrophe. The attacks show that the EU needs to focus on a more integrated internal security.
In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, many were quick to point the finger at Brussels. However, Belgium has not been sufficiently supported by its EU counterparts. While the Brussels neighbourhood of Molenbeek was home to the planners of the attacks in Paris and Brussels, and although the district’s police department had been suffering from its more than 185 unfilled positions, the terrorists were able to cross the national borders of the Schengen area unchecked. Moreover, they held EU passports, and travelled from Syria into the EU.
This is not a Belgian problem, but a Europe-wide one.
Europol has already moved towards a more integrated approach by establishing a joint information database known as ICT (Information Communication Technology). This is an advanced and secure system intended for cross-border cooperation and it has been effective in tracking and sharing information regarding terrorists, across member states.
Despite its existence, however, a large number of member states are not connected to the Europol database.
Cross-border terror networks such as Daesh and Boko Haram have managed to bypass police in various EU countries
While Europol has determined that 5,000 EU citizens have travelled to conflict zones in Iraq and Syria, only 2,786 foreign fighters have been recorded. The information sharing mechanism is in place, but it is not being efficiently used by all member states.
The EU needs to shift its focus, but Federica Mogherini is neglecting the internal dimension of security. The current focus is peacekeeping missions in Europe, yet police in EU municipalities still lack ‘boots on the ground’ – as well as the required training – to implement the Global Strategy within EU borders.
Moreover, despite having some of the most well developed de-radicalisation programmes in the world, such EU projects have not been translated into resource allocation at the local level.
Now, more than ever, there is a need for a common EU policing agency and information exchange system. Cross-border terror networks such as Daesh and Boko Haram have managed to bypass police in various EU countries, and have grown their web of connections quickly and easily. Regional police networks are disconnected, and limited in their ability to communicate amongst themselves and with other EU states.
The EU has successfully rolled out framework for comprehensive police networks before. Operation Archimedes is one success story, set up by Europol in 2014. Over the course of one week, over 20,000 police officers cooperated to create the largest cross-border joint police operation in the EU ever, with all 28 member states involved.
Nevertheless, a key obstacle to such implementation is that information sharing amongst police agencies differs from country to country. While joint intelligence exercises, such as the European Multidisciplinary Platform against Criminal Threats (EMPACT), are used as a base for police intelligence sharing, they do not take into account differences in police legislation amongst member states.
Single states cannot solve these issues alone. Europol’s existing ICT and EMPACT systems, supported by the success of Archimedes, can foster investment by member states in order to dissolve administrative and legal boundaries.
This in turn will ensure more efficient and productive police networks that share common goals, regulations, unions, and technology.
A set of shared objectives will increase communication and productivity, thereby building bridges for functioning and innovative police networks.
Ultimately, this common police system will create a dependency that fosters stronger diplomacy. It is the future for both national and European security.